Hi Bruce,
I'll weigh in on the discussion...
Considering what you have written, you should be looking for a didgeridoo that is from the Top End of Australia, anywhere in Arnhem Land if fine is you want a culturally-correct instrument made by the people who have a continuing unbroken cultural traditional with the didgeridoo.
What are the signs to look for in a traditional Aboriginal didgeridoo (see the
Cultural Indications Index on the page Ben kindly pointed out)? Not so easy but your best bet would be to go by name, if the name of the craftperson - if known - sounds like a Bininj or Yolngu name (Bininj and Yolngu being the people from Western and NE Arnhem Land respectively, they're very broad names but used here for convenience) then you're on the right track. Or just drop us the names on this forum of any instruments that might be prospective buys for you and we can advise further.
Whether the bore is termite-eaten and rough looking with nooks and crannies is not a good guide as to whether an instrument is authentic or not if you are searching for a CI 4 instrument to buy. Most CI 1, CI 2, and CI 3 instruments are termite-eaten and their bores are evidence of this. Sometimes these bores are drilled out entirely (if they weren't they'd be unplayable) so all you'll see are ring marks right down the bore. On the other hand, instruments of the highest level of authenticity, CI 4, are invariably termite-eaten as well, however, you'll find that they are sometimes/often worked at the bell and/or mouthpiece end - in contrast to what you might have read previously on the UK site.
If you see an instrument that has an entirely natural termite-eaten bore, it could fall into the categories of CI 1, CI 2, CI 3 and CI 4- so that's not helpful either.
If you are in the US, why don't you try Ben? LA Outback are ok for generic didgeridoos but are hardly the people I would go to for traditional sticks... they're been known to re-work (sometimes extensively) their instruments, mix-up artists' names, get details of artists/craftspeople awfully and embarrassingly wrong (one example pointed out to me is how they described Dhanggal Gurruwiwi as the wife of Djalu Gurruwiwi, which is a bad mistake to make... they're sister and brother and makes this a taboo relationship!). The question of ethics has been brought up by some of their clients... customers and suppliers, but best to find out the stories directly from them.
Well that's it in a nutshell!
Guan
bvandeuson wrote:
Hi, I'm new to the didjeridoo, although I collect and play other native/traditional/aboriginal instruments. I try to obtain instruments which are culturally correct, and made by the people traditionally represented by those instruments.
One didjeridoo website in the UK asserts that when a termite-hollowed Eucalyptus didgeridoo is left somewhat rough on the inside, excepting the mouthpiece and bell ends, it indicates the instrument is of authentic aboriginal make. In other words, one can still see nooks and crannies left by the termite activity.
I would appreciate the thoughts of others on this issue.
Bruce